Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2004


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

New Zealand Top 50 Singles of 2004

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails WP:V. WP:Deletion policy offers this as a rationale to delete an article, stating: "Articles for which thorough attempts to find reliable sources to verify them have failed". The only provided source redirects us to the website of the organisation, and as such, the content in this article is unable to be verified. Couldn't find any other sources either. Till 10:16, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS PEANUTBUTTER &#9734;&#9733; 10:45, 15 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep - The Official chart is online here. It looks the URL recently changed. I'll update it. Took me all of 30 seconds to find. - SimonLyall (talk) 11:05, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep with the source it doesn't seem to violate the deletion policy mentioned. — Ed! (talk) 14:09, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. I've taken a look at the PDF file of these year end charts, and the RIANZ specifically states that any reproduction of the material is strictly prohibited. This could probably deleted under CSD G12. Till  04:14, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.