Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand Top Fifty Singles of 2003


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Delete.  Nish kid 64  19:05, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

New Zealand Top Fifty Singles of 2003

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

List of the top [arbitrary number] or [arbitrary entertainment genre] in [arbitrary country] for [arbitrary year]. Listcruft. Guy (Help!) 22:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. EVula // talk // &#9775;  // 05:04, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep, is merely arbitrary because the others don't exist. Which isn't a reason for deletion. Plus the contents of the article are notable in themselves. Mathmo Talk 17:19, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * keep. Kripto 11:48, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   --  gadfium  23:54, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom, and as a copyright violation. This, and many other lists just like it, effectively duplicate the work of the source, in this case,  (search for 2003).  It's not stolen text, but it's stolen work.  Mango juice talk 18:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Guy. Potentially limitless (and thus indiscriminant) categorization possibilities.  Eluchil404 08:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Guy. Potentially limitless (and thus indiscriminant) categorization possibilities.  Eluchil404 08:18, 14 February 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.