Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand at major male beauty pageants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. czar 03:21, 11 February 2019 (UTC)

New Zealand at major male beauty pageants

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The article along with the other related articles specified below have no significant third party reliable sources to justify the claim that the following pageants are "major beauty pageants" namely: Manhunt International, Mister World, Mister International, Mister Global, Mister Supranational. Also, the articles failed to meet WP:GNG and clearly original research and synthesis. This is a bundled or consolidated nomination for deletion to include:

--03:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC) Richie Campbell (talk) 03:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lists of people-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 06:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete all of the male beauty pageant articles listed here. All spam. Mccapra (talk) 06:40, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment This deletion debate may be informative as it started with many of the same complaints. See Category:Male beauty pageants, I am concerned about WP:NOTSTATS. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 06:49, 4 February 2019 (UTC)).


 * Comment Article creator has clearly edited before under another username(s). Perhaps, a blocked editor who seems to share similar interest in beauty pageants/contestants. DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 09:12, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Neutral comment This nomination doesn't need to be repeated twenty+ times and load up the daily log. Please use only one of the noms to consolidate discussion and redirect the others to that one nom.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 17:30, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. Can you or anyone please help to consolidate the noms and redirect to one nom?-Richie Campbell (talk) 17:42, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Option 1: If you want to consolidate them into one, then leave one open (probably this one, since there is discussion), and for the others, change the link in every AfD page template for the other nominated articles to point to this nomination page, then request speedy delete A7/G6 for each of the other AfD nomination pages. However, that may end up as a WP:TRAINWRECK if people think that there is different value in the different bundled nominations. Option 2: if you want to leave the individual nominations open, go into each nomination page and remove the long list of links to other nominations. I think the second option makes more sense, since it avoids WP:TRAINWRECK, but either way is kind of a mess, so it's up to you. Bakazaka (talk) 20:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I have executed option 1. Thank for your help, Bakazaka---Richie Campbell (talk) 21:37, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thanks for sorting it out despite my A7/G7 typo. Bakazaka (talk) 22:22, 4 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete It seems as if "major" is arbitrarily defined by one source? Anyways, the sourcing on this is terrible, and I don't think we have articles like "England at major (individual) tennis tournaments" since it's an arbitrary breakout of a list unsupported by sources - possibly WP:OR. SportingFlyer  T · C  21:52, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all As above, the five are arbitrary, therefore it does not pass WP:NOTSTATS. Mister Supranational does not yet have a Wikipedia page, therefore a separate list saying how many Canadians have not won it is not yet needed. (Dushan Jugum (talk) 23:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)).
 * Delete all This is not the Olympics, it's too granular for individual country articles which do not have sources for the overall topic. Reywas92Talk 02:45, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all - for now. Until such time the subject will be better sourced.BabbaQ (talk) 07:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.