Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New Zealand fixtures and results


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep and rename to New Zealand national football team results (non-admin closure). Pablo  Talk  |  Contributions  08:42, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

New Zealand fixtures and results

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any other country-specific results article like this, and it looks suspiciously like a case of WP:NOT. Ambiguous title, too - fixtures and results in what? Given current sporting events, I doubt soccer would be on most New Zealanders' minds as a first choice. Grutness...wha?  11:31, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletions.   —Grutness...wha?  11:35, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. ChrisTheDude 11:40, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep England national football team results seems to have survived for more than a year without being deleted, so I guess this one should stay too. If it can be enlarged to cover every game the All Whites have ever played, it would be a useful addition. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  11:55, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah - the name fooled me - I couldn't find England fixtures and results or England football fixtures and results (nor similar for several other countries I tried). Grutness...wha?  23:33, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I looked at England national football team results as well and it seems like a valuable resource. I think it should be renamed though, New Zealand national football team results. The fact that it has an ambiguous name should not be a reason for deletion. Just change the title. Woodym555 11:59, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Has to be renamed. Other than that it does no harm. --Helenalex 14:16, 5 October 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.