Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New bridge in Kosovska Mitrovica


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Keep (nomination withdrawn).  Jerry  delusional ¤ kangaroo 22:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)

New bridge in Kosovska Mitrovica

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No assertion of notability or sources, not even a clear name. ninety:one 20:49, 23 September 2008 (UTC) 
 * Delete. If there is an article to be written here, it will have to be at a real title, and the current page contains nothing salvageable. --erachima talk 20:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment / merge into Kosovska Mitrovica &mdash; it's unclear whether "new bridge" is really the (English language translation of) the real name of the bridge, or simply a description of it. (It's not even totally clear which bridge in Mitrovice might be meant, if this isn't the proper name.) More constructively, I think the main reason the bridge is notable is so wrapped up in the history of the town of Mitrovice that the articles may as well be merged. – Kieran T  (' talk ') 21:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Serbia-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  21:14, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ff m  15:03, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep article has been improved, including the addition of high quality sources and clarifying the name issue. I see no reason why it should not be kept as it is now.  Jerry   delusional ¤ kangaroo 16:25, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per Jerry. VG &#x260E; 18:39, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Not sure if there's an accepted way, but I'd like to withdraw the nomination as the article has improved dramatically. ninety:one 19:40, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.