Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New central


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 03:49, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

New central

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non - notable building that isn't even completed yet. Contested PROD NtheP (talk) 09:59, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Please leave it Rory Anderson

(The above appears to be posted by the author of the article. There is an SPI at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Willrocks10 that might be relevant to this discussion. Peridon (talk) 19:03, 24 December 2010 (UTC))
 * Delete This is a very very small article and isn't needed you ocul probly find alot more information on the internet. Thanks Jragon &amp;#124 PHP isn&#39;t just a language, its a way of life. (talk) 14:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete - No reason at present to think this building will be notable (it's not particularly tall nor does it appear to be of architectural significance) and no refs have been provided to suggest any notabillity either. Maybe when it's completed it might have some notable function, but that would be speculation. Until then it's just a random building of no notabillity.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 10:08, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - very little evidence of notability, doubtful that any such evidence could ever be provided. --  role player 15:21, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.  —ThePaintedOne (talk) 10:52, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * KeepMore of the page will be added soon making it better including a photo! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willrocks10 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep (duplicate) Are you on a mission to delete all my articles ThePaintedOne. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Willrocks10 (talk • contribs) 2010-12-23 18:07:35
 * it wasn't me who proposed this, I just gave my opinion.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 18:20, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no evidence of notability. --Elekhh (talk) 23:28, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Note The contents of this page, along with that of The Centrium, Woking, which is also being considered for deletion, have been cut and pasted into a new article, Barratt Developments in Woking. All three articles were created by the same user. If both these article end up being deleted, I can't see how this new one could be notable either, and it could be seen as an attempt to avoid deletion. But in light of the comments made on the other AfD, I'm not going to propose the new page, I'll let others assess it.--ThePaintedOne (talk) 10:20, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete no doubt an addition to the tallest building in Woking, which was recently an AFD. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:28, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Blocks of flats - especially ones not even completed - are not always easy to show notability for (apologies for lousy style there), and it's not shown here, I'm afraid. Peridon (talk) 18:34, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.