Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New holocaust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. WP:SNOW  MBisanz  talk 04:52, 31 December 2008 (UTC)

New holocaust

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable neologism apparently coined by one journalist in a blog post. Contested PROD. Also POV issues (but that's not a reason for deletion).  Sandstein  22:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Not only is this radical title ridiculuos in its propaganda-fantasyland vocublary, but it is a clear aim to belittle the real Holocaust, of WW2, no battle between two sides can ever be called a "holocaust". It's even a serious crime on those 6,000,000! Diletodo (talk) 22:51, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete


 * strong delete for reasons above. 65.78.1.161 (talk) 23:12, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - No evidence that this term has achieved widespread use. The fact that it is being used by someone opposed to Israel's actions doesn't make it any more or less notable. We have articles here on Holocaust denial, and those who engage in Holocaust denial. If there is evidence that the current actions in Gaza are known to Arabs by a particular phrase, then we can include it. - Richard Cavell (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nick-D (talk) 01:20, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable statement, article created for WP:SOAP. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 04:16, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Diletodo with no further comment. JuJube (talk) 04:51, 31 December 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.