Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/New nsider


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 22:13, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

New nsider
On a free web host, so its Alexa rank of 683 would be misleading. Seems to be pretty new, thus article is promotional. Daniel Case 04:56, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom -Drdisque 04:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 370 members is not notable.  -- Rory 0 96 05:01, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. 370 members?  Really.  Non-notable.  --Kinu 05:02, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete As above - does not meet wiki guidelines at all VirtualSteve 05:04, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ad for a low-traffic forum.  Snurks T C 05:08, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as vanispamcruftisement. Royboycrashfan 05:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn vanity.Blnguyen 05:42, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete You should have seen how bad it was written before I changed it up :P Teabagged 05:47, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per member count. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  13:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete nn. Elfguy 14:11, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. &mdash;-- That Guy, From That Show!  (talk) 2006-02-08 15:38Z 
 * Delete per nom. Avi 16:13, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per WP:N. Dustimagic *\o/* (talk/contribs) *\o/* 22:19, 8 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was speedy deleted by Yanksox as G4/A7. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 09:02, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

New nsider
Article is about a non-notable website, and the subject is similar to another article that was recently deleted. JD [ don't talk|email ] 18:59, 29 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Strong delete and protect after deletion. I don't know what the old page looked like, but as this is the second time this article has been listed under AfD, it should be protected so it won't have to go through this process again. AgentPeppermint 19:11, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as a recreated deleted article. --PresN 20:16, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and for goodness sakes Protect it this time! Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  20:35, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per above, and looking at the creator's contributions, it's a clear case of using Wikipedia for vandalism. Ban. Danny Lilithborne 20:48, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy G4. Some of the content could be consolidated into Nintendo NSider Forums. Being a former member myself, the removal of the RP board turned a lot of people off, including me. I left two months earlier for Simtropolis and then WP on 12 November 2005. TrackerTV 23:29, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete and protect from re-creation, absolute textbook G4 - the editor forgot to remove "From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia" from the article! --Core des at talk. ^_^ 00:53, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.