Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newby's


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. –MuZemike 17:41, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Newby's

 * – ( View AfD View log )

No proclamation as to why it's notable, plus no references. If someone can tell me why this belongs on Wikipedia I'm all ears. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:57, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete – Fails every word of WP:GNG: no substantial third-party coverage by multiple reliable sources. JFHJr (㊟) 02:40, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Au contraire, here are two . That, plus the described lawsuit in federal court, makes it notable. Keep Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 03:59, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The second link is the University of Memphis school newspaper. I can dig up a million articles about "local hot spots" on or near any college campus in America if they have a school newspaper. The first link, while more trustworthy and less COI, is reporting on why the place is being sued. It's routine coverage; lawsuits =/= automatic notability, otherwise a lot of the jerks I went to high school with would have Wikipedia articles. Jrcla2 (talk) 06:50, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:11, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 13:12, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - I think the reliably sourced lawsuit with BMI, coupled with the number of events here, may be a weak case for notability. However, I have to point out that the article was written as an advert. --Orlady (talk) 15:20, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete as lacking significant coverage in multiple independent third party sources. Feel free to ping my talk page if these are added to the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 22:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Week Keep - Meeting GNG, per Memphis Daily News, Fox News Memphis. Northamerica1000 (talk) 09:32, 26 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep Google news archive search for their name plus "Memphis" shows results Glide Magazine reviews them.     D r e a m Focus  21:03, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.