Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle Aviation Academy


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. NW ( Talk ) 01:26, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Newcastle Aviation Academy

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability for this organization not established (using WP:ORG) as no sources support any claims made. The possible relationship with Kingston Uni is unclear as "supervising" does not imply an organizational relationship. It is not clear if this is an educational institute, a commercial training company or a charity. In accordance with WP:BEFORE, the article has been marked as an advert needing re-write but after no progress for over two years it would be better to delete and let someone create the article from new if there is real demand. Ash (talk) 15:48, 7 August 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 19:05, 14 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 05:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Cyber cobra  (talk) 05:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - tertiary educational establishment with courses leading to a professional qualification. "The possible relationship with Kingston Uni is unclear as "supervising" does not imply an organizational relationship." - actually, very little research demonstrates that there is a clear relationship - see ],, , , , , etc. TerriersFan (talk) 19:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JForget  23:10, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep. TerriersFan cites reliable sources.— S Marshall   Talk / Cont  23:45, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.