Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newcastle United Independent Supporters Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Newcastle United F.C.. I leave it to the editors to decide how much should be merged, but just noting to that the merge would require a redirect for attribution. While you can have a redirect without merger, you can't have a merger without a redirect. Star  Mississippi  02:11, 30 January 2022 (UTC)

Newcastle United Independent Supporters Association

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No evidence of notability. Article fails WP:GNG. We can’t have articles on all supporters groups in the world, and this one does not seem more notable than others. Paul Vaurie (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:05, 14 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 09:55, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Paul Vaurie (talk) 08:56, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:35, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 20:45, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Merge into Newcastle United F.C.. Not notable enough for a separate article, but a couple of lines in the main team article would be fine. Joseph2302 (talk) 09:26, 8 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Redirect I really don't see the point of a merge, a single sentence could cover this, however I see a soft-redirect as a possible search term. Govvy (talk) 11:26, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge per Joseph2302. I don't see independent notability for the group, and I don't see the need for a redirect given how few pageviews this has. Think the information can be merged into the supporter's section and be done with it. Jay eyem (talk) 18:56, 26 January 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.