Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newgen Software Tech


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This consensus has be muddied by the sock farm which targeted this discussion, but there is a clear delete consensus reached by uninvolved editors and this consensus is in keeping with the consensus reached at similar AfDs over a number of years. Barkeep49 (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Newgen Software Tech
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

While this has lots of sources, it does not appear to have overall context or explanations. Being on the stock market does not inherently make one notable. Ask me about air Cryogenic air (talk) 18:31, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2023 January 4.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 18:51, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and India. Shellwood (talk) 20:14, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * This AfD was filed by a suspected sock campaign, which has voted "keep" here. See Sockpuppet investigations/Darshak.parmar. -- The SandDoctor Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Keep There are sufficient sources to establish that this company meets WP:NCORP. Also added more information (context and did some explanation) but yes there's more contributions needed on the page. but i might it shouldn't be deleted as it is listed on BSE and NSE (stock market) and having more reliable sources.:Hayraan Aashna (talk) 09:48, 6 January 2023 (UTC) Blocked suspected sock of Darshak.parmar and confirmed sock of Munshi Talab. -- The SandDoctor Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Draftify Although the company gets a fair amount of coverage, the page creator should give some time to improve it to show why the company is notable. M.Ashraf333 (talk) 12:20, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 20:34, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Very strong keep Theis passes WP:NCORP, It shouldn't be deleted as listed on the BSE, and NSE is a credible assertion of importance Munshi Talab (talk) 10:14, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Blocked suspected sock of Darshak.parmar and confirmed to Hayraan Aashna. -- The SandDoctor Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep Allow the creators time to improve the article. Darshak Parmar (talk) 12:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC) Suspected sock master, see Sockpuppet investigations/Darshak.parmar. -- The SandDoctor Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Strong Keep The article is well-sourced, reliable, and exudes notability. JRed176 (talk) 20:45, 11 January 2023 (UTC) Suspected sock of Darshak.parmar. -- The SandDoctor Talk 20:48, 15 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - due to a lack of WP:CORPDEPTH in multiple independent and reliable sources, per WP:NCORP. An online search find press releases and trivial coverage that often appears based on press releases. This article appears to be WP:PROMO and the encyclopedia should be protected from it. Beccaynr (talk) 21:37, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The closing administrator may find this SPI interesting... firefly  ( t · c ) 08:49, 12 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure how to list previous AFDs but according to info at Articles for deletion/Newgen Software (2nd nomination), this is the 7th AFD on this company. Liz Read! Talk! 03:07, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP. Clear evidence of socking in this AfD, plus the six previous AfDs, as noted by Liz. BubbaJoe123456 (talk) 17:23, 13 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete fails WP:NCORP and WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:56, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.