Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newpark fc


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. per WP:SNOW and WP:N Black Kite 14:50, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Newpark fc

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Non-notable football club. No third-party sources present that prove notability or give any indication of significant results or achievements by the club. Note that there is another non-notable junior football club based in Ireland with the same name. Leave  Sleaves  14:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - completely non-notable amateur/social (most of the club's Tripod-hosted website seems to consist of "hilarious" pictures of the players getting drunk) team, playing in an amateur league -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:45, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hilarious player bios aside, this does appears to be a totally non-notable club playing the second division of a non-notable league - the South London Football Alliance doesn't have a Wiki article, which is rather telling. Google gives us nothing of value here. Bettia   (rawr!)  15:53, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

South London Alliance details can be found on football.mitoo
 * Delete: Very shitty article, needs more references. Willydick (talk) 17:20, 26 January 2009 (UTC)



Results for previous seasons are also on this website. Our greatest achievement (The Beckenham Hospital Charity Cup) is unfortunatly not listed on any websites, as they did not record the information online until the following season. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.72.162.166 (talk) 16:04, 26 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete This is blog material, not encyclopaedic. Kevin McE (talk) 16:34, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Keep - They are on the new eltham WIKI page so why not? Who cares if they are not a professional club, get off your pedestals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.139.162.137 (talk) 18:16, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Why are you reading this? Bazza can see you.. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.145.33 (talk) 19:55, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 20:02, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Fails WP:N. Schuym1 (talk) 23:32, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. пﮟოьεԻ   5  7  14:22, 27 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:FOOTY, which the aggrieved players and fans commenting here should go and read. AlexTiefling (talk) 17:00, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * WP:FOOTY is the "frontpage" for the football project. Did you mean WP:FOOTYN?  Even if yes, that only covers notability for players, not clubs.  Regardless, this article fails WP:N, WP:V and every other policy going..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 17:03, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

I know these guys....good to see them flying the flag for people who love sport and being part of a socially active club as opposed to castigating some light hearted fun from the safety of their mothers box room. Pull out the plug and get a life! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.149.48.44 (talk • contribs)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.