Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newry Junior Chamber


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:40, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

Newry Junior Chamber

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per nom, doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG (the 3 or 4 news mentions are limited in scope, not focused specifically on the subject, and of the "passing mention" variety). Nor does it seem to meet WP:NONPROFIT (not "national or international in scale" - in fact by definition and per lead is a local group with a small number of members). In short, doesn't seem to meet either the general NN criteria (for coverage), or the org/non-profit criteria (for scope). Guliolopez (talk) 22:54, 25 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: Not notable, and so fundamentally promotional that WP:TNT would be necessary even if it met WP:NONPROFIT and WP:RS could be found. -  Julietdeltalima   (talk)  02:09, 30 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Recently, I've come across many not for profit organizations on the Afd desk. These organizations do credible work in their space, and have considerable mentions with respect to the conferences/events/competitions they hold and the awards they give. Unfortunately, while media reports on these events et al, they fail to report on the organization itself. This results in a strange situation, where while my personal opinion would be to keep some of these non-profits for informational purposes, they don't qualify on our notability guidelines, either for organizations or for non-profits. I would personally prefer a newer addition to the NONPROFIT guideline to enable some kind of leeway as is given to higher level schools or to state/country level political parties, where, even if only trivial mentions are there, precedent tends towards keeping the articles. Till such guidelines become operational, it's tough to !vote keep. Thanks. Lourdes  05:36, 1 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.