Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsMax misinformation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was merge. Johnleemk | Talk 16:02, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

NewsMax misinformation
Tagged as speedy, but disparaging one's subject is ok in this case if one has reliable references that you are citing. AfD should take a look to see that this isn't simply a POV screed or something of that ilk. -Splash talk 23:12, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete POV from the title and throughout the article --Mecanismo 23:34, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with NewsMax. Looks like a POV-fork to keep criticism out of main article.  Jkelly 00:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The talk page indicates that this is indeed the case. -Splash talk 00:43, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * In that case, Speedy merge, and invite many editors to watchlist. Jkelly 00:56, 6 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Rewrite to reduce POV problems (particularly the preamble) and merge with NewsMax, preferably in a "Controversies" section. B.Wind 04:21, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge and rewrite, in that order. Needs a heavy clean up, but examples of Newsmax misinformation should certainly be in the main article. It's not like it's very long. --Last Malthusian 09:05, 6 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge Reliable sources of misinformation should be in the main article. -FD — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.200.116.65 (talk • contribs) 23:02, 6 December 2005
 * Merge Newsmax doesn't deserve two pages grazon 03:28, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into NewsMax, although most of the article is POV and should not be merged. Rhobite 02:35, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Mergeper Rhobite, Derktar 03:31, 12 December 2005 (UTC).
 * Merge --Eliezer | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€  01:58, 13 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.