Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/News 3 (WSIL-TV) and Edan Schultz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as G7 (non-admin close) Beeblebrox (talk) 23:21, 2 October 2008 (UTC)

News 3 (WSIL-TV) and Edan Schultz
Two articles i created related to WSIL-TV have many notability issues in my opinion. What do you think?. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mythdon (talk • contribs) 
 * I think you need to sign your posts. :-P Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 02:47, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Local news cruft for a small-market station, this can go in the parent article if it fits and is notable.  Nate  • ( chatter ) 08:09, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  TravellingCari  21:08, 28 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Stuff into WSIL-TV and delete the rest. Raymie Humbert (TrackerTV) (receiver, archives) 01:13, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * um, if the article's creator wants their work deleted, can't we just call it G7 Speedy Delete? I've checked the history and the nominator is the only one to add real content to both articles, so if you just tag each page with and add a link to this afd, we can put this one in the can. Beeblebrox (talk) 03:36, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ok, I went ahead and tagged them as such myself. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:11, 2 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.