Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/News media phone hacking scandal comparisons with Watergate


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 02:46, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

News media phone hacking scandal comparisons with Watergate

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No topic here, just a quotefarm and odd mentions of Watergate in context of modern phone hacking, tied together using a synthesis of historical Watergate studies and modern phone hacking analysis. Binksternet (talk) 12:59, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NOT. Page filled with lengthy block quotes comparing two events with each other. Although most of the quotes do reference Watergate and the News International phone hacking scandal together, some of the early prose draws conclusions from unrelated sources. Would need a complete overhaul, summerising and removing all the quotes on the page, to make it encyclopedic. Funny  Pika! 15:18, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge relevant information to News_International_phone_hacking_scandal. A lot of synthesis here, the meat might be worthwhile in the main article. Thargor Orlando (talk) 16:52, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * I can see how a merge might help flesh out the main phone hacking scandal article. Binksternet (talk) 20:00, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not an encyclopedic topic, random assemblage of news media metaphors. Carrite (talk) 20:22, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment - Wow, somebody put a lot of work into this. Sorry. Carrite (talk) 20:23, 16 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Per nom, very unencylopedic  Jay Jay What did I do? 01:25, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:46, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:47, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of News-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:48, 19 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete: consists not entirely, but largely of synthesis. Unless the comparisons themselves can be shown to meet the GNG I don't see why this would be considered an encyclopedic topic. CtP  (t • c) 19:45, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.