Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newsbabe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 19:46, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Newsbabe

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

a journalist got called it? Big deal. No sources. Will (talk) 07:22, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete It seems to have sources but they aren't very notable and the term seems like a neologism.  Wikidudeman  (talk) 13:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NEO - no references that actually talk about the term and not just use it. Corpx 16:20, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete funny, but still a neologism with no third-party, secondary sources. VanTucky  (talk) 22:29, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong keep. Rush coined the term many years ago and many have used it.  It gets over 17k ghits and has existed long enough to be more than a short term word.  It is controversial because it sounds negative but was conceived as a neutral term.  There are many references outside of the article, and it isn't required that the sources be used to justify the notability of the phrases infobabe/newsbabe.  The article needs to be properly referenced, not deleted.  Pharmboy 22:32, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Prevalent attitude in broadcast news. Not neologism. Wl219 11:00, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination, not even worthy of passing to Wiktionary or even Urban Dictionary. Burntsauce 17:23, 1 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.