Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newscycle Solutions


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:53, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Newscycle Solutions

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I found no significant coverage and none are in the article. SL93 (talk) 03:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. Bakazaka (talk) 07:27, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - There are some press releases and general announcement stuff, but nothing that establishes WP:CORPDEPTH. Possibility to redirect to Vista Equity Partners. --CNMall41 (talk) 20:24, 1 January 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vanamonde (talk) 03:14, 8 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP / WP:CORPDEPTH. Promotionalism only. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:39, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete References fail the criteria for establishing notability, mainly PRIMARY sources, announcements, fails WP:ORGIND. Topic fails WP:NCORP and GNG. Might also be worth looking at Atex (software) to delete if this article ends up being deleted - otherwise Atex could be merged here. Struck the last comment. Only a part of Atex was acquired.  HighKing++ 15:01, 13 January 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.