Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newstrend


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete grounded in policy. KaisaL (talk) 23:42, 5 March 2020 (UTC)

Newstrend

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable news site sourced to spammy pr sites and fake news sources (like "ceo magazine") number of followers or fans are completely irrelevant. Praxidicae (talk) 16:36, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:49, 26 February 2020 (UTC)

According to Praxidicae all references provided here non-notable such as ANI News, Yahoo!, Alexa, Blasting News. But i can see clearly all these websites are notable and trusted even listed on Wikipedia. User Praxidicae also claimed followers on Facebook page are fake. How is it possible all 6.3 million followers are fake that indicates Facebook running a fake business of its fake users, is it so? Now my comment for Theceomagazine: It is not a fake website it has a registered office in New Delhi, India.) Slowthin (talk) 06:14, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Ceo magazine is pay for publishing spammy nonsense. The sources you cite as lending notability are press releases, stats, not coverage, another press release, a site know well for it's lack of truthful reporting, not reliable and not coverage.Praxidicae (talk) 15:13, 27 February 2020 (UTC)
 * You have not answered my all questions in the above comment. However i am explaining further for your comments: It seems like you want to prove yourself true by removing content from Blasting News. 1200+ Alexa Global ranking is itself a good notability factor of the company. Asian News International is not a press release website. Newstrend is a news website which is a good resource in itself. It is not an e-commerce website selling goods and products. And most importantly you must not ignore my point that it has 6.3 million followers which is again a good notability factor (According to you these are irrelevant).Slowthin (talk) 07:19, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * No, alexa is not coverage and it's just stats. As far as Blasting News - I removed incorrect, unsourced content as per policy. You should re-read the ANI source, specificall the end where it's content by NEWSVOIR, a press release publishing service. Praxidicae (talk) 13:37, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Yes, Alexa is not a coverage but here Alexa.com is referenced to justify its Global ranking. And again you ignored my point that it has 6.3 million followers which is enough to justify its notability. And it is one of the top 10 most popular websites for receiving huge traffic. And most importantly it is a news website, it doesn't need more references to justify its notability.Slowthin (talk) 08:22, 29 February 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete per Praxidiae. Slowthin's keep rationales are not at all convincing. Followers, views, etc. are not notability. buidhe 02:31, 5 March 2020 (UTC)
 * buidhe has no valid point according to Wikipedia Guidelines. What do you understand by Alexa ranking? And What do you understand by 6.3 million followers. This website has 1042 Global Alexa rank that shows this website has a huge traffic which is an indication of its notability. And this is a news website not a product selling e-commerce. These points are enough to justify its notability.Slowthin (talk) 05:28, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Strong Delete - Not just the references are fake and spammy but the site itself has been accused of spreading fake news and spam. Doesn't meet WP:WEB, WP:GNG. KartikeyaS343 (talk) 16:14, 5 March 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.