Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton Arvin

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was KEEP

Newton Arvin
Definitely notable, this is a must keep!!! I dont understand why, something so critical would even be considered for deletion. KEEP!
 * del. nonnotable. old news. Mikkalai 07:07, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's a towering work of genius now that I'm done with it.
 * Vote by User:64.160.45.112, who has a dozen edits.
 * Weak keep as published author, even if he only writes meta-literature. Radiant_* 10:17, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, you can buy his book and a biography of him  on Amazon.com, plus 800 Google hits, pretty good for an author who's been dead for more than 40 years. --bainer 12:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep - Very notable. Whats with you guys? --Irishpunktom\talk 14:42, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - National Book Award = notable. FreplySpang (talk) 14:49, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notable enough for me. --Myles Long 15:55, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep this "towering work of genius". Kappa 19:51, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep -- notable enough. - Longhair | Talk 12:30, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * keep because it is very notable ok? Yuckfoo 00:45, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.