Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Newton Recreation Centre


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 13:11, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Newton Recreation Centre

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

completely unreferenced article. Google news search shows no hits outside of Metro Vancouver. Fails WP:GNG, WP:CLUB. Even the few Vancouver hits don't show any real notability. No claim made to any architectural merit Gtwfan52 (talk) 05:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a gym with a pool, with no indication of notability. The hits in Google are all promotional (Foursquare, Facebook, TripAdvisor, Tourism Surrey) --John Nagle (talk) 06:28, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. I was inclined to AfD this when I added to its talk page. Not notable, AFAICT.   PK  T (alk)  15:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete - Both Google US and Google Canada News & Books provided nothing about the history of the recreation centre or other significant details. Of course, searching with Google News provided event listings and other minor mentions. SwisterTwister   talk  20:17, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of British Columbia-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete - non-notable. Only one independent source by the city - that refers to it as the former "Newton Wave Pool".Moxy (talk) 19:57, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.