Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NexGen Storage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  01:08, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

NexGen Storage

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

They do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Most of the references are paid press releases. Daringsmith (talk) 16:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:56, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:54, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:55, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete or merge: this sounded familiar. Indeed, back in 2016 I proposed merging this into Fusion-io but the merge expired a couple years later after I got re-employed briefly. There already is a brief mention of NexGen in that article. If I have some time today I can try to mention it in the SanDisk article too, since it is not clear where it should go. Probably not enough sources to make the case for a separate article. W Nowicki (talk) 22:41, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete seeing as how there is already a mention in the Fusion-io article, references fails NCORP criteria for establishing notability.  HighKing++ 15:56, 22 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.