Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NextStep ReUse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:07, 21 October 2010 (UTC)

NextStep ReUse

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Asserts notability, but I do not see evidence that it passes WP:CORP. Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:05, 7 October 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 01:39, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete &amp; Salt - Article lacks sufficient Attribution for Verifiability of the WP:CORP notability criteria, which is why I stuck a Db-inc on it … given that it has been deleted twice already (G12 and A3), perhaps it should be salted? The author should have used (and in the future, should use) a sandbox/sub-page to add some WP:RS (should any exist) and then move it into article space. Happy Editing! &mdash;  02:57, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak keep: Salting, at least, would seem inappropriate since there actually are significant sources for this charity. Google News archives search turns up dozens of stories, mainly in the local Eugene Register Guard,  but there is national coverage as well: the CBS national news program The Early Show broadcast a profile on the organization and its founder, Lorraine Kerwood, on March 7, 2008 {see "Woman With Autism Heads Computer Recycler: Turns Talents For Fixing Them Into Green Service For Needy" and "Autistic Woman Keeps Giving" (the latter a video)}; she's also mentioned in other local and non-local media news stories, some relating to her winning a "Volvo for Life" public service award in 2008: New York Times, Minneapolis Star-Tribune, YES! Magazine, People magazine.   I note that an attempted article about Lorraine Kerwood was evidently speedy-deleted earlier today.  I'd be inclined to think that the sources indicate enough notability to support an article about the charity and its founder, under one or the other title.--Arxiloxos (talk) 06:59, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Keep under its name nextstep recycling it gets coverage. . LibStar (talk) 04:34, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.