Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Danish parliamentary election (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Elections in Denmark. v/r - TP 01:20, 22 October 2011 (UTC)

Next Danish parliamentary election
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

Premature - there's no information here (the projected next date can be mentioned in Folketing). Article can be created (though preferably under a title that does not include "next") when there is information about who is running, etc. –Roscelese (talk &sdot; contribs) 18:20, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Denmark-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 19:27, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge into Elections in Denmark. A slightly more precise statement of what is there at present. Bridgeplayer (talk) 21:54, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 22:15, 21 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Note the related redirect is currently being discussed at Redirects for discussion/Log/2011 September 21, where it has been suggested to retarget that title to Next Danish parliamentary election, the subject of this AfD. The administrator closing this discussion should note the outcome of that discussion and act accordingly (e.g. deleting the redirect per WP:CSD if this article is deleted or retargetting if this article is merged). Thryduulf (talk) 18:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as unreferenced. Stuartyeates (talk) 08:13, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment - now referenced. Bridgeplayer (talk) 13:24, 26 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I have seen many such articles at Wikipedia. As a matter of fact Candada has a whole category dedicated to future elections: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Future_elections_in_Canada. I see no harm in letting Wikipedians be prepared ahead of time. If we don't allow for this preparation the quality of the coverage will surely drop. Ottawahitech (talk) 04:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 00:20, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - they have just finished the last election, so the "Next Danish parliamentary election" is a useful article to keep and grow. Zickel (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete. This article is a joke. Nothing here that can't be covered in Elections in Denmark. And if you compare it to Canada, then the article title should reflect the actual year. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 13:02, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant    (talk)  01:09, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - WP:TOOSOON, WP:HAMMER. Article is nothing more than "the next election will be on X". - The Bushranger One ping only 01:04, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.