Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Generation Transmission


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Dual clutch transmission. -- Ged UK  20:02, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

Next Generation Transmission

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Neologism for a crystal ball product feature.  MBisanz  talk 19:57, 2 May 2009 (UTC) 
 * Delete I think the first three words of the article ("Honda marketing term") say plenty about this article. This is definitely a neologism. TN X Man  23:15, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  --  J mundo 00:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:48, 9 May 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete as a neologism, and a not at all notable one at that. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 03:26, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 *  Delete , obviously just an advertising "marketing term" neologism. Nothing like Direct-Shift Gearbox yet but could become worthy of an article in the future. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 09:03, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge along with references to a mention in dual clutch transmission. Let's try to WP:PRESERVE information here. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 09:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge I agree with the above. Afkatk (talk) 22:19, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Commnet if merged, the history should be moved to a subpage, since "Next generation transmission" is not an appropriate redirect. 76.66.202.139 (talk) 05:56, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Why not? Replace the contents of the page with:


 * 1) REDIRECT dual clutch transmission
 * And the history will still be there as well as marked that it's a redirect from a merge.-- OlEnglish (Talk) 08:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.