Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next INpact


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  00:12, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Next INpact

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I find no coverage applicable to establishing notability. At best, the website is cited in a few places as the source for information related elsewhere. The references in the article are almost exclusively to the website the article is about. There are also no Google hits for the stated parent company, INpact MediaGroup. Largoplazo (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

PS: I searched for the former name as well and found nearly nothing. Largoplazo (talk) 22:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Largoplazo (talk) 21:59, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 22:06, 12 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment French article has 4 sources in French, but I can not assess their quality. Anton.bersh (talk) 23:24, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * It has five sources, but the first is their own website. The second includes it in one row of a long table of websites. The third source was co-produced by INpact. Based on what I can see of the fourth and fifth—there's a paywall—they may qualify, but they're by the same writer in the same publication, Le Figaro, so I think it counts as one source. Largoplazo (talk) 00:32, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarification, your reasoning makes sense. I immediately disregarded the first source, but was not sure about the other four. I'll comment "delete" below. Anton.bersh (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:59, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per source analysis above. Anton.bersh (talk) 13:02, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Fails WP:NCORP, I cant find any coverage in reliable sources independent of them whatsoever.Alimovvarsu (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above. BuySomeApples (talk) 06:17, 21 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete as per NOM. No RS for this, fails WP:NCORP. Deathlibrarian (talk) 22:42, 21 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.