Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next Nature (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 19:41, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Next Nature
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable book. Worldcat shows only 52 copies in libraries. No adequate reviews--the SAmer "review" is actually a guest blog posting, and their book blog postings seem  not to be consistently unreliable. The reviewer does not appear to be an established authority.  DGG ( talk ) 03:54, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 07:51, 19 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete Has peripheral coverage but nothing like multiple reviews in a reliable source. -- GreenC 06:51, 20 December 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.