Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Next nature


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. — Mets501 (talk) 03:27, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

Next nature

 * — (View AfD)

Non-notable book advertisement (hint: the book title is "Next nature" and it was published in 2005) wrapped up in pseudo-scientific lingo and pretending to be a concept. According to Amazon, the sales rank of the book is "#1,519,462" - which is absolutely horrible. -- ChrisWakefield 02:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nominator. --ChrisWakefield 02:45, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Unclear exactly what this article is supposed to be about, but appears to be some sort of "The robots are going to take over the world!" essay.  Original research at best. Wavy G 18:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I would also consider Koert van Mensvoort, who appears to be the creator of this term (and the author). Wavy G 18:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thx for the suggestion. Prod'ed as non-notable.  --ChrisWakefield 19:41, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable.-- danntm T C 21:25, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom.--thunderboltz(Deepu) 16:11, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.