Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nexus Solicitors (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 22:11, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Nexus Solicitors
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

N - sourcing fails WP:CORP, DEPTH isn't good. Previous Articles_for_deletion/Nexus_Solicitors was low participation Widefox ; talk 22:40, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:45, 11 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. Small law firm (9 partners, 33 lawyers including non-partners).Icewhiz (talk) 08:47, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete: The text and available references indicate a company going about its business with routine announcements, but nothing available, including the Legal500 listing, appears indicative of encyclopaedic notability. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 08:52, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails gng Chetsford (talk) 19:06, 13 May 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.