Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ngayong Nandito Ka


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:33, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Ngayong Nandito Ka

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

fails WP:NFF no indication this future film has reach primary photography stage on second review - it looks like it has been made into a movie circa 2003 and then a remake was (is being?) made, and then (a sock editor who was blocked for creating hoax articles about shows starring a reality tv person) added that it is also the name of an upcoming TV show. I guess? Active Banana   ( bananaphone  03:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as it fails WP:NFF. Airplaneman   ✈  03:56, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * As cast list is/was of the 2003 film, NFF does not apply and article is being re-written to reflect that 7-years-old release. Any rumours of an remake can be included only if verified.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:16, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment Until 16 January 2010 the article contained just "A Philippinne film by produced by Star Cinema" and a cast list. It was then edited to include a second cast list headed "2010 Cast" and a single sentence about a supposed 2010 television series. There is absolutely no reliable source traceable anywhere to confirm any of the information added. I have made several different searches and found nothing. For example, a Google search for "Ngayong Nandito Ka" "Ivan Dorschner" "Tricia Santos" (the name of the series and the first two stars listed) produced 13 hits, none of which made any mention of this series except for ones which explicitly gave Wikipedia as their source. The information was added to the article by an IP with a history of unconstructive editing to film and television related articles. The IP's editing also bears a strikingly similar pattern to those of several sockpuppet IPs and accounts (now blocked) with a history of adding information about Tricia Santos, who is given in this article as one of the stars. Some of the information added by those sockpuppets is certainly misinformation, and more of it is dubious. Needless to say I have removed the content added by this editor. This returns the article to just a cast list. My own opinion is that such a trivial article is pointless, and that the film is not really notable enough to warrant an article, but I don't feel strongly about it one way or the other, as long as the removed misinformation stays removed. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:24, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
 * Agree. Any hint toward a remake does not belong unless rumours can be verfied. Article is now being re-written and sourced to reflect the 2003 film.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:16, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 00:51, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 05:03, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep per my own WP:BEFORE showing the film as meeting WP:NF per available sources that would allow improvements. Notability in the Phillipines is notable enough for en.Wikipedia. That it is in a poor state and has not yet been improved would be a reason to get help from Filipino Wikipedians, but does not act as a reason to delete.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 01:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:47, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment and as article appeared originally to be about the 2003 film (rumoured remakes notwithstanding) I am fixing the article to reflect it being about the 2003 film.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:11, 5 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Second relist rationale Article is now clearly about a 2003 film, not a 2010 subject. / ƒETCH COMMS  /  00:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep. The 2003 movie info is sourced and it looks to have been a notable production.  Eluchil404 (talk) 03:06, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.