Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Công Phượng (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SpinningSpark 12:12, 7 January 2015 (UTC)

Nguyễn Công Phượng
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Speedy deletion per WP:G4 was declined on the grounds that the last version did not mention the club for which he currently plays. That does not change the fact that he still has not played in a fully pro league or for the Vietnamese national team, and has not received significant coverage, meaning the article still fails WP:NSPORT and WP:GNG. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:49, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Sir Sputnik (talk) 15:50, 30 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete and SALT - still fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. Nothing has changed - the G4 was valid. GiantSnowman 15:54, 30 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete and SALT until the player meets WP:NFOOTY or WP:GNG. — Jkudlick t c s 03:24, 2 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Per previous AfD. IJA (talk) 16:25, 3 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 10:21, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.