Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Du Secondary School


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that additional sources are not sufficient evidence of notability. Mojo Hand (talk) 23:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Nguyễn Du Secondary School

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The article has been left unreferenced and as a stub for 11 years, the only information on the article has been the school address which clearly fails notability even for high schools. There are many schools in Vietnam with the same name, and there doesn't seem to be a lot of information available about this specific school. If worth-mentioning, the article is also an orphan. RandomEditorAAA (talk) 00:48, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Curbon7 (talk) 02:56, 7 September 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete Nothing notable. Oaktree b (talk) 16:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep., . I added some newspaper references. I think notability is now clear. Sometimes Google searches for school articles can be more productive if you include both the school name and the street name where it is located, especially when several schools have the same name. Eastmain (talk • contribs) 17:43, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank you @Eastmain for the source finding, however still when I searched up "Nguyễn Du Secondary School 139 Nguyen Du Street" and similar search terms, I get sites that are basically mirrors of this article, or sites that copy the information of this article. I thought I found another name for it called "Nguyễn Du Gifted High School" but from what I found searching that up, they seem different. From the news search, I only found minor mentions such as this, I think same applies with the sources you gave. If more sources are found that give more than a small mention, then I think that this article might be notable. Perhaps I am just bad at source finding. Thanks - RandomEditorAAA (talk) 00:58, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Extraordinary Writ (talk) 14:56, 14 September 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Qwaiiplayer (talk) 12:11, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. Schools are not normally notable and this one is not an exception.--Bduke (talk) 00:52, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete. None of the sources provided by Eastmain constitute significant coverage as the stories are trivial WP:ROUTINE local news pieces per WP:NOTNEWS. One article is about 9th grade exam procedure changes during COVID and the other is about a changed lunch schedule. The other is the school's website. This is not significant coverage. Fails WP:SIGCOV and WP:NORG.4meter4 (talk) 20:38, 29 September 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.