Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyễn Văn Minh Tiến


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Nominator has voted keep, no outstanding delete opinions. Courcelles 01:10, 3 January 2011 (UTC)

Nguyễn Văn Minh Tiến

 * – ( View AfD View log )

I do not think this person is notable enough to warrant an article. I cannot find any information about him (in English, I do not read Vietnamese) on the internet. It seems as if it was written by someone who knew him personally as there is lots of emotive language in the article. Also, it has not been improved for some time, so in my opinion should be deleted. Andy4226uk (talk) 16:20, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * With nothing much to go on in English, this is tricky, but I'd say keep, at least initially unless someone who reads Vietnamese can tell us that there is not significant coverage of the man in the gnews hits, or that the news sources covering him aren't reliable. If the coverage is significant, and the sources are reliable (and if this not a case of WP:BLP1E), then I don't see a problem with notability. He appears to have been making headlines in Vietnamese newspapers for a span of at least 2 years. Looking at google translate, the sources are about the guy in our article. Sources in English are not a requirement (although it's easier to judge notability when they are in English!), and "emotive language" can be cleaned up. It desperately needs sources, but I don't see an issue with WP:N or WP:V, if someone that speaks Vietnamese can help out.-- Beloved Freak  19:08, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - per belovedfreak. definitly.--BabbaQ (talk) 00:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - OK, I am persuaded by belovedfreak's points. I just hope someone who reads Vietnamese reads this and can expand it a bit :). Andy4226uk (talk) 01:45, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Perhaps someone in Category:User vi might be able to help? From what I can tell, he seems to be a kind of real-life Batman!-- Beloved Freak  13:09, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.