Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nguyen Thanh Nam


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:03, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Nguyen Thanh Nam

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

His employer is notable, but there are no citations to multiple, independent, reliable sources indicating this particular executive's own individual notability. This is a no-prejudice nomination, on behalf of whoever tagged the article with Notability two months ago (for all I know, Nam is huge in Vietnam). If the article is kept, it should be moved to Nguyen Thanh Nam (businessman) or whatever, and Nguyen Thanh Nam made into a disambiguation page with that entry and Nguyen Thanh Nam (pool player), who is definitely notable and will have an article eventually when the cue sports project gets around to him in creating articles on top pro players. —  SMcCandlish  &#91;talk&#93; &#91;cont&#93; ‹(-¿-)› 02:41, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions.  —Thryduulf (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete, this is basically a résumé with no indication of notability. Thryduulf (talk) 11:17, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete This is the lone contribution to Wikipedia by an SPA . No coverage by independent sources (i.e., other than the corporation he works for). Mandsford (talk) 15:28, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 17:19, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:01, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Non-notable resume. لenna  vecia  15:40, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.