Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ni (attack)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was The result was delete. There really isn't an argument for keeping this page, and it's a classic demonstration of why Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Daveydweeb ( chat/review! ) 22:40, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Ni (attack)

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

School fad neologism. A classic example of a page failing Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Witty lama 00:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete as total nonsense. This doesn't deserve the time of day on AFD. exolon 00:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete db-nonsense (tagged). JuJube 00:44, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Though I agree that this page is silly it is not "nonesence" under the CSD definition - it is perfectly clear english. Furthermore, as per WP:CSD neologisms do not belong at CSD. Witty lama 00:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete changing my vote, reasonably sensical albeit stupid. JuJube 00:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Delete Unsourced school fad. janejellyroll 01:07, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I think it is worth noting that the original creator just blanked the page.  Someguy1221 01:35, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm sorry. I went away from my keyboard and my cousin blanked the page for a joke. I will restore the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianonavy (talk • contribs)
 * Comment That's not a reason to keep. JuJube 01:49, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * CommentFine then. here is a reason. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianonavy (talk • contribs)
 * Keep Look up Ni on Google. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ianonavy (talk • contribs)
 * Comment And that is helpful how? In case you've forgotten, there's a popular sketch centered around the word "Ni", among a boatload of other things. JuJube 01:53, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "created by two students at an anonymous school" is a clear violation of Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ 02:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Ianonavy - please address how this page can satisfy the criteria for a) WP:N, and b) Reliable sources. This would be the best way to proceed. Witty lama 02:04, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Do you think they think these things up in school on purpose? BTLizard 15:26, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.