Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nia Sanchez & Feminism


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Move to draftspace as this is obvious and no more time is needed (NAC). SwisterTwister  talk  01:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Nia Sanchez & Feminism

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Topic within itself is not notable. Should be deleted, and if consensus, merged into article on Nia Sanchez CNMall41 (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Move to Draft space. It appears the article's creator is part of a Louisiana State University program for writing articles.  If this one had been submitted through the Articles for Creation process, it likely would never have made it onto main space.  I don't think it's ready for merging to the Nia Sanchez article; nor do I wish to just delete a new editor's first attempt.  So, let's put it in Draft space.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 00:54, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - More or less agree with . Student assignment that looks like it could use some additional work (and/or shifting sights to an expansion of the main Nia Sanchez article rather than creating a new title). Pinging the instructor, and the Wiki Ed Content Expert supporting the class, . &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 15:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd support moving it to draft space, but we can see what the instructor says. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * A merge or a move back to userspace would probably be best. There may be enough to support a section in the main biography. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 16:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment - No objection to consensus if there is one (move, delete, etc.). I am just not sure that we should allow the creation of a content fork because the person is a student. If moved to userspace (which I will gladly support), I would advise to let the instructor know that the topic could be, in my opinion, one that is not suitable for a standalone article. Feel free to consider my nomination withdrawn if you feel it best to move back to userspace. --CNMall41 (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Indeed, that was my intention -- that the article be moved into draft space until it is ready for merging into the Nia Sanchex article. My apologies for not stating that more clearly.  NewYorkActuary (talk) 19:42, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I have contacted the instructor, Transunicorn so they can discuss the issue with the student user. Moving the content back to the student's sandbox/user space will allow for the student to correct any issue, while still contributing content. They also can address and incorporate feedback, making this the learning opportunity we celebrate. Thank you all for not deleting the content. We sincerely appreciate the learning opportunity this affords. BCarmichael (talk) 17:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)
 * BCarmichael - thanks for contacting me - and thanks everyone else for your input and feedback. I'll be in touch with my student to see how we can move forward. I appreciate all of your support (I am also newer to this so learning as I go.). Thanks! Transunicorn (talk) 21:37, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   12:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks, but it doesn't seem like this needs relisting. All participants including the nominator seem satisfied with the idea that this should be moved to the student's userspace. (I would NAC myself if I hadn't already added to the thread). &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 13:09, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Move per previous discussion and consensus. Ceosad (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.