Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niagara River Lodge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Davewild (talk) 17:51, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Niagara River Lodge

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non notable building, if the article is about the 1928 building. . No references for being on any list of historical buildings (or for anything else). If it's about the organizaion, non notable club. A Masonic Lodge in NYC founded in 1883 is not old enough to be historic, and no other notability is even asserted.  DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)  DGG ( talk ) 02:53, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:08, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:41, 26 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  12:15, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - The article is largely about the organization, Niagara River Lodge #785, and not about the building. Searching online does not find coverage of the building itself.--Rpclod (talk) 12:43, 3 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - no independent sources, no coverage to be found at web searches, run-of-the-mill masonic lodge/building. Kraxler (talk) 17:45, 10 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.