Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nial


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. T. Canens (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2018 (UTC)

Nial

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Sourced solely by self-published references for nearly 9 years. Cabayi (talk) 17:30, 6 February 2018 (UTC)


 * I almost never resort to it but this is a case for WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP. There is a reasonably large literature on Nial, and it seems to me that sections not devoted to the syntax could easily be sourced properly, so this should be kept. Mangoe (talk) 18:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article issues can be fixed and do not justify deletion - there are plenty of sources available in Google Books for starters. --Michig (talk) 19:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep clearly a notable programming language, just from looking at the Google results and the Google Books results. Rockypedia (talk) 19:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep It a fifth generation language. More than coverage for keeping and expanding the article. scope_creep (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.