Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niall Bruton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep per Snow/Speedy Keep - Non-Admin Closure. Fosnez (talk) 12:40, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Niall Bruton

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

little recalled irish athlete; who with passage of time lacks notability
 * I am completing this nomination on behalf of Natalie (talk) 01:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. He competed at the IAAF World Championships In Athletics and the IAAF World Indoor Championships. That proves notability. --Eastmain (talk) 04:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.   —Eastmain (talk) 04:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Because he has received attention from some very well established newspapers, I believe notability has been established. See http://news.google.com/archivesearch?q=%22Niall+Bruton%22&btnG=Search+Archives&ie=UTF-8 (Mind meal (talk) 04:57, 4 February 2008 (UTC))
 * Speedy Keep. Clearly notable. Pointless AFD nomination.--Michig (talk) 12:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep International class athlete and notability doesn't evaporate over time. Nick mallory (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep indeed. I realize that Natalie Erin was acting in good faith, but we don't need to complete every misguided deletion nomination made by anonymous editors.  RFerreira (talk) 18:03, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Better to just let this run its course so their opinion is obviously refuted then have to continue to deal with this particular issue. The anonymous user is on a bit of a campaign in regards to Irish athletes, and this seems to be the easiest way to demonstrate to him or her that the opinion is not shared. Natalie (talk) 19:04, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. No valid deletion reason given by nominator. Notability is not temporary. Phil Bridger (talk) 18:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.