Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nianio


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 07:35, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Nianio

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The topic has no evidence of notability. The article is unreferenced, and the article's creator states in the edit summary that the article is based on http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/2083, a forum, which suggests that the topic is indeed not notable. Searching for "Nianio" by itself and in combination with "design pattern", "programming", and "software" with Google Web, News, Books, and Scholar returns no relevant results. My position is delete, although I am willing to reconsider if evidence of notability is provided. Rilak (talk) 07:51, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:49, 11 April 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete Design patterns in computing is a well covered topic in the literature, and any design pattern that is notable should be easily sourceable to a reliable source rather a discussion forum. A search of Google books and scholar turns up no such coverage for a design pattern of this name.  Note that the discussion forum that was used as the basis for this article doesn't even mention the name "Nianio" until the very bottom where the originator of the tread states "I asked about it, because some guys I know are advocating structuring programs in that way, and they named it "Nianio" pattern. There is an informal overview of Nianio out there on the web, along with some examples of contexts and problems where it could be applied, but unfortunately it is in Polish language. So I was curious to what extent are they re-inventing the wheel." -- Whpq (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.