Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 20:23, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Niat Qabool Hayat Kakakhail

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No sourced indication of notability. The only information I can find is in mirrors of the content of this article; I see nothing in reliable sources. Ultimately fails WP:GNG. Possibly created by someone familiar with the subject (i.e., a relative), based on the author's username. Kinu t/c 20:59, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - I agree with the suggestion that there might be a conflict of interest here. The user appears to be creating articles based on a family of people sharing the name Hayat. I've brought the user to the attention of ANI where I am awaiting some sort of resolution, as the user keeps removing deletion templates from articles and has submitted copy/pasted content. In this case, the subject's notability does not yet appear to be established per WP:POLITICIAN, which I am assuming is the appropriate criteria, since it is very difficult to understand who this fellow is. The article suggests he was a village head of some sort, but village-level politics doesn't seem to be on the radar of WP:POLITICIAN. No results either at Google News or Google Books. Also appears to contain copy/pasted and/or closely paraphrased content taken from here for example. Note the content about moonlight polo. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 17:32, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Even assuming good faith, I'd delete this NN person. He fails WP:42. Bearian (talk) 22:00, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.