Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nic Kerdiles


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per the WP:GNG claims made by Rlendog - "doesn't meet GNG" is a bare assertion and is not enough to contest evidence to the contrary. This article may be renominated for deletion if people feel that the sources given are not sufficient. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:28, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Nic Kerdiles

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NHOCKEY and WP:GNG Joeykai (talk) 12:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards,  KC Velaga   ✉  14:40, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete non-notable hockey player.John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:19, 20 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - he misses NHOCKEY but he comes close on multiple fronts (he wasn't a 1st round pick, but was a high 2nd rounder; he hasn't played 200 AHL games, but has quickly reached our old standard of 100; he has some awards albeit none that meet NHOCKEY; he played on multiple WJC gold medal teams, which is not an NHOCKEY criterion but is an indication that he is more than a run-of-the-mill player). As a result, I was able to find enough coverage to convince me he meets GNG, e.g.,, , , , , , . Rlendog (talk) 18:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable. Doesn't mean NHOCKEY.  Is not competitive to make an NHL roster this season, so is not expected to reach the notability requirements soon enough to justify keeping the article. GLG GLG (talk) 07:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * If he meets GNG he meets our notability requirements, even if he doesn't meet NHOCKEY. 13:23, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't agree he meets GNG either GLG GLG (talk) 05:24, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
 * What is wrong with the sources I provided? Rlendog (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:28, 25 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 05:04, 1 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.