Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nica Noelle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07  ( T ) 18:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Nica Noelle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails gng and pornbio. Being interviewed is primary and doesnt count. Being a columnist doesnt count unless someone writes about your content and being nominated does not count anymore Spartaz Humbug! 21:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep Article easily meets both WP:GNG and WP:PORNBIO. It is well sourced. The nomination for AFD is questionable. MarnetteD&#124;Talk 21:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This AfD his hardly questionable. I'm undecided, but the subject fails PORNBIO with only award nominations. Several of the porn trade sources appear to be republished press releases. However, notability per WP:CREATIVE may be claimed. • Gene93k (talk) 18:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. The article clearly details that she is more than just a performer. For starters, she co-founded several notable companies, some of which have either won awards for their films (Sweetheart Video, Sweet Sinner) or have won awards themselves as a company (Girl Candy Films). Also, "being a columnist doesn't count unless someone writes about your content"...is this a guideline?  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 03:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * The relevant [guideline doesn't give credit for being a published columnist [[User:Spartaz|Spartaz]] Humbug! 20:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * So you mentioned a guideline that doesn't prove your point? Anyway, point #3 of that guideline clearly states: "The person has created or played a major role in co-creating a significant or well-known work or collective body of work", which she indeed passes.  Erpert  blah, blah, blah... 21:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - per argument by Erpert and MarnetteD. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   17:30, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. I'm seeing a nice amount of secondary source coverage, at . &mdash; Cirt (talk) 04:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - The subject here has "been featured multiple times in notable mainstream media" - namely in The Huffington Post & Salon. Also, the subject's body of work so far "has won significant critical attention" - namely a significant number of awards and nominations for films made by Sweetheart Video (pre-late 2011) and for the film series Lesbian Adventures. Guy1890 (talk) 04:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.