Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicaraguan immigration to Mexico


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Nicaraguan immigration to Mexico

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. Maybe could redirect  NickGibson3900 Talk 01:51, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Article seems to be a mistake, does not address topic in title. This could be a notable topic, but this article is not helpful. Borock (talk) 05:24, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 11:58, 30 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete – More a Wiktionary term than an article. ShoesssS Talk 13:06, 30 October 2014 (UTC)
 * delete unsourced one line article. Almost a speedy. LibStar (talk) 02:20, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - WP:A1, WP:A3 - Firstly the text does not match the content.The title is "Nicaraguan immigration to Mexico", yet there is nothing about immigration in the text. Reading the text gives insufficient context to identify the subject of this article. Moreover, there is no content. The text starts with a topic, which should be the title, but isn't, and the only content is rephrasing that topic. There is no actual content. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A1. Obviously - says nothing about the topic, and not much at all. --Sammy1339 (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete - Pick a number, any number. Shit like this should not be here clogging up AfD. Carrite (talk) 11:54, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. To the extent this article's about anything, it's not what the title says it's supposed to be about. It doesn't seem like content worth keeping even if the title were changed to reflect the sentence in the article, because there's no assertion of why the subject is important. (A7) Egsan Bacon (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.