Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NiceTorrent


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. &mdash; Scientizzle 17:08, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

NiceTorrent

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable website Gray5512 (talk) 00:49, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete article is about a website that is new and not notable. NiceTorrent is less than a month old, created March 7th 2008. AlbinoFerret (talk) 01:30, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:WEB. No coverage, not even trivial. No awards. DarkAudit (talk) 03:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * merge or delete : merge with BitTorrent (protocol) if not then delete it . may become a reason for more such torrent articles . --@ the $un$hine . (talk) 18:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Merge or Delete I agree with entry above. OneHappyHusky (talk) 22:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete and oppose merge - there's no coverage and wikipedia isn't a directory service so there's nothing to merge -- Whpq (talk) 13:37, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I think this article screams of WP:CRYSTAL. It claims the site is one of the most popular torrent sites, but the site has only been up since March 7, 2008?  No wonder it's not notable, this article is several months premature, if it ever returns at all.  Wikipedia is not a crystal ball to what might be notable in the future.   Red Phoenix  (Talk) 15:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.