Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Booth

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 14:55, 26 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Nicholas Booth
Umm.. This is Nicholas Booth. I didnt write this, but it is flattering. Maybe stick it in the joke section, I'm sorry about the mistake. Thankyou for writing whoever you are. Unsigned comment by 68.237.82.179, that was added to the top of this vfd page.

Somewhat self-deprecating, but vanity nonetheless Preisler 04:42, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. It might be amusing to read for some, but it doesn't belong in Wikipedia. Gemtiger 06:49, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable, vanity. Megan1967 08:05, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. All vanity. If Nicholas Booth "is an avid user of Wikipedia," then I do not understand why he is not aware of what Wikipedia is not. Zzyzx11 09:21, 20 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Your extraordinary amount of charisma didn't convince me -- Longhair 03:14, 21 Feb 2005 (UTC)