Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Chistiakov


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. G11, promotional requiring rewrite.  Ty  04:15, 26 August 2008 (UTC)

Nicholas Chistiakov

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

While I first tagged it as a Speedy. I'm not so sure now. There are no refs in reliable sources, which in itself is not a reason to delete. Google search shows works being hosted in various galleries.

Still not sure, if that counts as Notability. So here it is. ChiragPatnaik (talk) 03:04, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – David Eppstein (talk) 04:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: In its present form, it's a curriculum vitae, and Wikipedia does not host those.  The article, such as it is, is from a 1st person POV.  Just as we would reject advertising for Napa Auto Parts, we have to reject advertising for an artist who does have a high profile.  Could it be rewritten?  Possibly, but we consider the article for deletion, not the imagined article for deletion.  Utgard Loki (talk) 13:26, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. --NZQRC (talk) 17:09, 25 August 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Please do something, we had nothing more as a desire to make informative page, now, this deletes just making name look unserious and damaging public image, i have nothing against your opinion, and actually rewrited material for page, so please do something to prevent this speedy delete be assosiated with name. it's damage for public image, once again

also why dont you use email instead blogging all over the web while your opinion is not expert, but for some reason it's popping up on top of google search, just some sort of black PR. no just look what are you doing. also you could write to e-mail in other sourses for artist work and ask, is your blogging really helps.

please remove this page from Wiki and google, we did not expected our desire to make informative and interesting page will command just loads of negative and empty talks on top of Google index. just think what are you doing here.