Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas E. Alahverdian


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 04:12, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Nicholas E. Alahverdian
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Multiple anon-IP removed WP:G11's. Article is too full of peacocking, puffery and self-promotion to be encyclopedic. I cannot even determine if WP:GNG is met. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  02:05, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Rhode Island-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:44, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment. The subject has been deleted from Wikipedia at Articles for deletion/Nicholas Alahverdian and speedied as G4 at Articles for deletion/Nick Alahverdian. • Gene93k (talk) 13:48, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I would try to G4 it, but I already placed the AfD since the CSD tags kept getting removed.-- &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  16:26, 1 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete At some point in the future Alahverdian's cases may rise to the level of notability, and then he may be notable, but that has not happened yet, so I don't think he is notable now.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:09, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.