Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicholas Hicks-Beach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus for deletion is established. North America1000 01:44, 17 July 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas Hicks-Beach

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:NAUTHOR and WP:GNG. The sources come nowhere near to showing he meets notability criteria. 1 is his agents page and 2 and 3 don't mention him. Nothing found in a before search that show sufficient notability Dom from Paris (talk) 13:09, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:10, 3 July 2018 (UTC)

==Contested deletion==
 * Keep This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... Hicks-Beach is a recognized industry figure with a verifiable body work that has been recognized as notable and worthy of documenting by Wikipedia beforehand. Writers will far smaller and/or less notable filmographies have been allowed articles here before, such as Cameron McAllister and Andrew Rattenbury, and there seems to be no issue.SavageEditor (talk) 13:27, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Each article is judged independently of others and the sources that have been added have to show notability. If Hicks-Beach is a recognised figure then there should be sources to show this. You have not added any. Please read WP:GNG. Dom from Paris (talk) 13:48, 3 July 2018 (UTC)
 * BTW I think you were right about Cameron McAllister and Andrew Rattenbury they are no more notable than this person so I have nominted for deletion too. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:29, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Fails WP:BASIC, WP:ANYBIO and WP:FILMMAKER. Unable to locate any significant biographical information in reliable secondary sources; most were trivial mentions such as . Magnolia677 (talk) 09:50, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   19:13, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per . Daask (talk) 15:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete the sources come no where near establishing notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:38, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete as per .Deathlibrarian (talk) 03:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG and WP:NAUTHOR - Lacking notability Snowycats (talk) 04:16, 15 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.